Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVDKX vs RMFEX
FVDKX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FVDKX vs RMFEX
FVDKX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVDKX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVDKX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FVDKX (3.98B). FVDKX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FVDKX (1.55) vs RMFEX (1.42). FVDKX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FVDKX (18 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). RMFEX (0.62) and FVDKX (0.59) have similar cost to investors . FVDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). FVDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: FVDKX (0) vs RMFEX (250). FVDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.61 vs. RMFEX (9.80). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 40.50 vs. FVDKX (27.73).
| FVDKX | RMFEX | FVDKX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.62 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.62 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.673 | 9.711 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.98B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 1.42 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.61 | 9.80 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.16 | 36.55 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.73 | 40.50 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.89 | 99.78 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement