Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVLZX vs JVMCX
FVLZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FVLZX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Advisor Value Z
Price$36.20
Change-$0.07 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.49M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.48B
FVLZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVLZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVLZX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.5B vs. FVLZX (322M). FVLZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FVLZX (0.91) vs JVMCX (0.00). FVLZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FVLZX (9 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FVLZX (0.80). FVLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). FVLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FVLZX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.96 vs. FVLZX (-10.15). FVLZX return over 5 years is better than : 57.32 vs. JVMCX (26.91).
| FVLZX | JVMCX | FVLZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.85 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.86 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.392 | 6.877 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 322M | 23.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.15 | -7.96 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.48 | 9.36 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.32 | 26.91 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement