Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVLZX vs JVMCX
FVLZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FVLZX vs JVMCX
FVLZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVLZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVLZX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. FVLZX (409M). FVLZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FVLZX (1.07) vs JVMCX (0.00). FVLZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FVLZX (10 years) vs JVMCX (15 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FVLZX (0.68). FVLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. JVMCX (48.00). FVLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FVLZX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). FVLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.70 vs. JVMCX (0.77). FVLZX return over 5 years is better than : 42.69 vs. JVMCX (9.33).
| FVLZX | JVMCX | FVLZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.85 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.86 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.963 | 12.392 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 409M | 23.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.70 | 0.77 | 2,295% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.34 | 16.32 | 241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.69 | 9.33 | 457% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement