Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVSKX vs JVMCX
FVSKX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FVSKX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Value Strategies K
Price$51.58
Change-$0.68 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$25.82
Change-$0.30 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.46B
FVSKX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVSKX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVSKX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. FVSKX (1.65B). FVSKX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FVSKX (0.36) vs JVMCX (0.00). FVSKX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FVSKX (17 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FVSKX (0.72). FVSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). FVSKX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FVSKX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.44 vs. FVSKX (-9.64). FVSKX return over 5 years is better than : 71.17 vs. JVMCX (45.41).
| FVSKX | JVMCX | FVSKX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.87 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.88 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.030 | 2.055 | -293% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 21.5B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.64 | -4.44 | 217% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.74 | 13.31 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.17 | 45.41 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.00 | 25.18 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement