Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVSKX vs JVMCX
FVSKX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FVSKX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Value Strategies K
Price$55.23
Change-$0.26 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.68B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.41
Change-$0.21 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.76B
FVSKX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVSKX vs. JVMCX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVSKX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.8B vs. FVSKX (1.68B). FVSKX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FVSKX (0.34) vs JVMCX (0.00). FVSKX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FVSKX (17 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FVSKX (0.72). FVSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). FVSKX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FVSKX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.11 vs. FVSKX (-4.57). FVSKX return over 5 years is better than : 69.86 vs. JVMCX (44.48).
| FVSKX | JVMCX | FVSKX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.87 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.88 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.093 | 9.170 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 23.8B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.57 | -0.11 | 4,211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.21 | 9.40 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.86 | 44.48 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.95 | 33.90 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement