Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVSKX vs JVMCX
FVSKX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FVSKX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Value Strategies K
Price$57.17
Change+$0.25 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.32B
FVSKX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVSKX vs. JVMCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVSKX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. FVSKX (1.74B). FVSKX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FVSKX (0.32) vs JVMCX (0.00). FVSKX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FVSKX (17 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FVSKX (0.72). FVSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). FVSKX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FVSKX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.22 vs. FVSKX (-1.83). FVSKX return over 5 years is better than : 75.63 vs. JVMCX (48.03).
| FVSKX | JVMCX | FVSKX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.85 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.86 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.154 | 11.265 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 24.3B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.83 | 1.22 | -150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.94 | 21.25 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.63 | 48.03 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.39 | 45.05 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers