Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVWSX vs RGACX
FVWSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FVWSX vs RGACX
FVWSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVWSX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVWSX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FVWSX (14.8B). FVWSX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FVWSX (0.60) vs RGACX (0.00). FVWSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FVWSX (14 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FVWSX (0.00). FVWSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FVWSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FVWSX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.93 vs. FVWSX (-1.31). FVWSX return over 5 years is better than : 23.16 vs. RGACX (10.91).
| FVWSX | RGACX | FVWSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.938 | 5.397 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 357B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.31 | 0.93 | -141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.94 | 33.65 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.16 | 10.91 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.93 | 94.42 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers