Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVWSX vs RGACX
FVWSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FVWSX vs RGACX
FVWSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVWSX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVWSX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FVWSX (15.4B). FVWSX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FVWSX (0.58) vs RGACX (0.00). FVWSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FVWSX (14 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FVWSX (0.00). FVWSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FVWSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FVWSX (0) vs RGACX (250). FVWSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.68 vs. RGACX (3.68). FVWSX return over 5 years is better than : 28.89 vs. RGACX (13.46).
| FVWSX | RGACX | FVWSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.094 | 6.959 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.4B | 357B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.68 | 3.68 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.50 | 37.13 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.89 | 13.46 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.02 | 97.58 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement