Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVWSX vs RGAFX
FVWSX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FVWSX vs RGAFX
FVWSX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVWSX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVWSX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FVWSX (15.2B). FVWSX pays higher dividends than RGAFX: FVWSX (0.59) vs RGAFX (0.46). FVWSX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FVWSX (14 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). RGAFX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FVWSX (0.00). FVWSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). FVWSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FVWSX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX (12.49) and FVWSX (12.10) have marching annual gain over last year. FVWSX return over 5 years is better than : 34.31 vs. RGAFX (20.71).
| FVWSX | RGAFX | FVWSX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.387 | 8.854 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 361B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.46 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.10 | 12.49 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.13 | 50.06 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.31 | 20.71 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.83 | 121.55 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement