Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVWSX vs RGAGX
FVWSX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FVWSX vs RGAGX
FVWSX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVWSX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVWSX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FVWSX (15.3B). FVWSX pays higher dividends than RGAGX: FVWSX (0.59) vs RGAGX (0.51). FVWSX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FVWSX (14 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). RGAGX (0.29) is less costly to investors than FVWSX (0.00). FVWSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FVWSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FVWSX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. FVWSX (-2.74). FVWSX return over 5 years is better than : 20.27 vs. RGAGX (15.00).
| FVWSX | RGAGX | FVWSX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.271 | 9.321 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.3B | 353B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.51 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.74 | 0.49 | -559% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.88 | 44.65 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.27 | 15.00 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.22 | 110.30 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers