Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs NPFCX
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs NPFCX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$36.18
Change+$0.21 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.28B
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$65.16
Change+$0.36 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. FWAFX (3.28B). FWAFX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: FWAFX (0.52) vs NPFCX (0.00). FWAFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWAFX (16 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FWAFX (0.98). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWAFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.10 vs. FWAFX (-4.06). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.07 vs. FWAFX (23.55).
| FWAFX | NPFCX | FWAFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.48 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.48 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.162 | 12.539 | 49% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 156B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.06 | 10.10 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.10 | 43.14 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.55 | 40.07 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.78 | 77.31 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers