Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs NPFCX
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs NPFCX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$37.32
Change-$0.13 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.37B
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$65.61
Change-$0.18 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.43B
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. FWAFX (3.37B). FWAFX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: FWAFX (0.51) vs NPFCX (0.00). FWAFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWAFX (16 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FWAFX (0.98). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWAFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.78 vs. FWAFX (5.64). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.88 vs. FWAFX (18.40).
| FWAFX | NPFCX | FWAFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.48 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.48 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.888 | 13.316 | 74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.37B | 157B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.64 | 14.78 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.68 | 29.87 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.40 | 30.88 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.17 | 75.86 | 79% |