Ad is loading...
FWAFX vs NPFCX
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs NPFCX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$31.09
Change+$0.10 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.95B
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$57.31
Change+$0.48 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.68B
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FWAFX (2.95B). FWAFX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: FWAFX (0.59) vs NPFCX (0.00). FWAFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWAFX (16 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FWAFX (0.98). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWAFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.60 vs. FWAFX (-8.74). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.94 vs. FWAFX (24.69).
| FWAFX | NPFCX | FWAFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.48 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.48 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.773 | -1.019 | 861% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.95B | 139B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.74 | 4.60 | -190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.08 | 14.30 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.69 | 42.94 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.75 | 50.59 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers