Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs NPFCX
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs NPFCX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$39.44
Change+$0.45 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$69.08
Change+$0.39 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWAFX (3.51B). FWAFX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: FWAFX (0.49) vs NPFCX (0.00). FWAFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWAFX (17 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FWAFX (0.98). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWAFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.78 vs. FWAFX (0.27). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.18 vs. FWAFX (16.71).
| FWAFX | NPFCX | FWAFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.48 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.48 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.407 | 19.309 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 164B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | 12.78 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.91 | 61.00 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.71 | 30.18 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.46 | 91.09 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement