Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs NPFCX
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs NPFCX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$38.66
Change-$0.17 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.38B
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$68.05
Change-$0.19 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWAFX (3.39B). FWAFX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: FWAFX (0.50) vs NPFCX (0.00). FWAFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWAFX (17 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FWAFX (0.98). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWAFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.62 vs. FWAFX (4.12). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.67 vs. FWAFX (22.12).
| FWAFX | NPFCX | FWAFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.48 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.48 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.938 | 17.530 | 80% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.12 | 13.62 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.48 | 48.39 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.12 | 33.67 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.13 | 91.95 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement