Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs NPFCX
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs NPFCX
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and NPFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. FWAFX (3.93B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: NPFCX (0.33) vs FWAFX (0.30). FWAFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWAFX (18 years) vs NPFCX (26 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FWAFX (1.06). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWAFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). FWAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.33 vs. NPFCX (2.83). NPFCX (6.04) and FWAFX (5.75) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWAFX | NPFCX | FWAFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.47 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.47 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.237 | 6.030 | 253% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93B | 169B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.33 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 2.83 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.02 | 35.62 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.75 | 6.04 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.67 | 98.13 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement