Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs NPFCX
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs NPFCX
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWAFX (4B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: NPFCX (0.33) vs FWAFX (0.29). FWAFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWAFX (17 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FWAFX (1.06). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWAFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). FWAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.95 vs. NPFCX (12.68). FWAFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.96 vs. NPFCX (14.35).
| FWAFX | NPFCX | FWAFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.47 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.47 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.328 | 6.915 | 280% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4B | 164B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.33 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.95 | 12.68 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.73 | 39.88 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.96 | 14.35 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.30 | 102.83 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement