Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs NPFCX
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs NPFCX
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FWAFX (4.16B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: NPFCX (0.33) vs FWAFX (0.28). FWAFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWAFX (17 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FWAFX (1.06). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWAFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). FWAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.16 vs. NPFCX (6.26). FWAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.14 vs. NPFCX (8.52).
| FWAFX | NPFCX | FWAFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.47 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.47 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.288 | 4.931 | 411% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.16B | 170B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.33 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.16 | 6.26 | 290% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.37 | 30.32 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.14 | 8.52 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.44 | 96.35 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers