Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPCX
FWAFX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPCX
FWAFX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWAFX (4B). RNPCX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPCX (0.70) vs FWAFX (0.29). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPCX (24 years). FWAFX (1.06) and RNPCX (1.05) have similar cost to investors . FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPCX (23.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPCX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPCX (250). FWAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.95 vs. RNPCX (13.40). FWAFX (17.96) and RNPCX (17.30) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWAFX | RNPCX | FWAFX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.05 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.05 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.328 | 7.104 | 272% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4B | 164B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.70 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.95 | 13.40 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.73 | 42.43 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.96 | 17.30 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.30 | 110.50 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement