Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPCX
FWAFX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPCX
FWAFX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. FWAFX (3.93B). RNPCX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPCX (0.70) vs FWAFX (0.30). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: FWAFX (18 years) vs RNPCX (24 years). FWAFX (1.06) and RNPCX (1.05) have similar cost to investors . FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPCX (23.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPCX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPCX (250). FWAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.33 vs. RNPCX (3.49). RNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.76 vs. FWAFX (5.75).
| FWAFX | RNPCX | FWAFX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.05 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.05 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.237 | 6.341 | 240% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93B | 169B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.70 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 3.49 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.02 | 38.08 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.75 | 8.76 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.67 | 105.61 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement