Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPEX
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$35.52
Change+$0.39 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.08B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$67.73
Change+$0.62 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.59B
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. FWAFX (3.08B). FWAFX pays higher dividends than RNPEX: FWAFX (0.56) vs RNPEX (0.51). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWAFX (16 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.84 vs. FWAFX (-5.42). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 49.55 vs. FWAFX (24.60).
| FWAFX | RNPEX | FWAFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.081 | 11.197 | 28% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 153B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.51 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.42 | 10.84 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.87 | 40.13 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.60 | 49.55 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.42 | 82.45 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement