Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPEX
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$36.74
Change+$0.35 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.28B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$68.96
Change+$0.44 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.52B
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. FWAFX (3.28B). FWAFX pays higher dividends than RNPEX: FWAFX (0.52) vs RNPEX (0.49). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWAFX (16 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.58 vs. FWAFX (-2.39). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 40.49 vs. FWAFX (20.74).
| FWAFX | RNPEX | FWAFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.778 | 13.216 | 51% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 156B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.49 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | 11.58 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.96 | 46.41 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.74 | 40.49 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.75 | 80.14 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement