Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPEX
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$37.32
Change-$0.13 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.37B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$69.32
Change-$0.19 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.43B
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a StrongBuy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. FWAFX (3.37B). FWAFX (0.51) and RNPEX (0.49) have matching dividends . FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWAFX (16 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.89 vs. FWAFX (5.64). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.89 vs. FWAFX (18.40).
| FWAFX | RNPEX | FWAFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.888 | 13.807 | 72% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.37B | 157B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.49 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.64 | 15.89 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.68 | 32.50 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.40 | 35.89 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.17 | 84.29 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement