Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPEX
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$38.66
Change-$0.17 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.38B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$71.95
Change-$0.20 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a StrongBuy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWAFX (3.39B). FWAFX pays higher dividends than RNPEX: FWAFX (0.50) vs RNPEX (0.48). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.70 vs. FWAFX (4.12). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.75 vs. FWAFX (22.12).
| FWAFX | RNPEX | FWAFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.938 | 18.125 | 77% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.48 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.12 | 14.70 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.48 | 51.36 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.12 | 38.75 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.13 | 101.17 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers