Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPEX
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$39.44
Change+$0.45 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$73.06
Change+$0.41 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWAFX (3.51B). FWAFX (0.49) and RNPEX (0.46) have matching dividends . FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. FWAFX (0.27). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.13 vs. FWAFX (16.71).
| FWAFX | RNPEX | FWAFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.407 | 19.947 | 72% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 164B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.46 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | 13.85 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.91 | 64.22 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.71 | 35.13 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.46 | 100.25 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers