Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPEX
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$38.18
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.57B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$70.94
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Hold and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. FWAFX (3.57B). FWAFX (0.48) and RNPEX (0.46) have matching dividends . FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. FWAFX (-3.12). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 26.72 vs. FWAFX (13.12).
| FWAFX | RNPEX | FWAFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.444 | 16.467 | 69% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 159B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.46 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.12 | 11.64 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.41 | 46.03 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.12 | 26.72 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.01 | 87.04 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement