Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FWAFX (3.91B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPFX (1.21) vs FWAFX (0.30). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWAFX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). FWAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.22 vs. RNPFX (7.04). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.76 vs. FWAFX (10.22).
| FWAFX | RNPFX | FWAFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.45 | 236% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.45 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.152 | 5.075 | 299% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.91B | 170B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.21 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | 7.04 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.60 | 34.96 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.22 | 13.76 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.25 | 108.85 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers