Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWAFX (4B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPFX (1.18) vs FWAFX (0.29). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWAFX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). FWAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.95 vs. RNPFX (14.29). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.94 vs. FWAFX (17.96).
| FWAFX | RNPFX | FWAFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.45 | 236% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.45 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.328 | 7.358 | 263% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4B | 164B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.18 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.95 | 14.29 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.73 | 45.67 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.96 | 20.94 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.30 | 118.48 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers