Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. FWAFX (3.93B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPFX (1.18) vs FWAFX (0.30). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWAFX (18 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWAFX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). FWAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.33 vs. RNPFX (4.30). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.12 vs. FWAFX (5.75).
| FWAFX | RNPFX | FWAFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.45 | 236% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.45 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.237 | 6.762 | 225% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93B | 169B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.18 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 4.30 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.02 | 41.21 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.75 | 12.12 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.67 | 113.42 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement