Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FWAFX (4B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPFX (1.18) vs FWAFX (0.29). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWAFX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). FWAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.62 vs. RNPFX (13.73). FWAFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.11 vs. RNPFX (17.55).
| FWAFX | RNPFX | FWAFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.45 | 236% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.45 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.589 | 6.578 | 359% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4B | 172B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.18 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.62 | 13.73 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.08 | 43.12 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.11 | 17.55 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.05 | 127.31 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement