Ad is loading...
FWAFX vs RNPGX
FWAFX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPGX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$30.33
Change-$1.48 (-4.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.95B
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$59.24
Change-$2.46 (-3.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
FWAFX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPGX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Hold and RNPGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FWAFX (2.95B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPGX (0.89) vs FWAFX (0.59). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FWAFX (16 years) vs RNPGX (16 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.41). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPGX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPGX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPGX (250). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.70 vs. FWAFX (-10.85). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 70.96 vs. FWAFX (46.18).
| FWAFX | RNPGX | FWAFX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.41 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.41 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.661 | -0.724 | 920% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.95B | 139B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.89 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.85 | 2.70 | -401% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.17 | 3.23 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.18 | 70.96 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.02 | 64.91 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...