Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPGX
FWAFX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPGX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$35.52
Change+$0.39 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.08B
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$69.23
Change+$0.63 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.59B
FWAFX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPGX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. FWAFX (3.08B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPGX (0.82) vs FWAFX (0.56). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FWAFX (16 years) vs RNPGX (16 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.41). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPGX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPGX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPGX (250). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.34 vs. FWAFX (-5.42). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.75 vs. FWAFX (24.60).
| FWAFX | RNPGX | FWAFX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.41 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.41 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.081 | 11.392 | 27% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 153B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.82 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.42 | 11.34 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.87 | 41.35 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.60 | 51.75 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.42 | 85.81 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement