Ad is loading...
FWAFX vs RNPGX
FWAFX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPGX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$31.09
Change+$0.10 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.95B
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$61.72
Change+$0.52 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.68B
FWAFX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPGX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FWAFX (2.95B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPGX (0.89) vs FWAFX (0.59). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FWAFX (16 years) vs RNPGX (16 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.41). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPGX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPGX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPGX (250). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.02 vs. FWAFX (-8.74). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 50.62 vs. FWAFX (24.69).
| FWAFX | RNPGX | FWAFX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.41 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.41 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.773 | -0.692 | 1,268% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.95B | 139B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.89 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.74 | 6.02 | -145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.08 | 17.64 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.69 | 50.62 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.75 | 60.74 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...