Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPGX
FWAFX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPGX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$38.66
Change-$0.17 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.38B
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$73.60
Change-$0.20 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
FWAFX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPGX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a StrongBuy and RNPGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWAFX (3.39B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPGX (0.77) vs FWAFX (0.50). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPGX (16 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.41). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPGX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPGX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPGX (250). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.19 vs. FWAFX (4.12). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.81 vs. FWAFX (22.12).
| FWAFX | RNPGX | FWAFX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.41 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.41 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.938 | 18.423 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.77 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.12 | 15.19 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.48 | 52.72 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.12 | 40.81 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.13 | 104.87 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement