Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPGX
FWAFX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPGX
FWAFX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPGX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWAFX (4B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPGX (1.23) vs FWAFX (0.29). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPGX (17 years). FWAFX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.40). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPGX (23.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPGX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPGX (250). FWAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.95 vs. RNPGX (14.36). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 21.23 vs. FWAFX (17.96).
| FWAFX | RNPGX | FWAFX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.40 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.40 | 265% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.328 | 7.401 | 261% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4B | 164B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.23 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.95 | 14.36 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.73 | 45.94 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.96 | 21.23 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.30 | 119.10 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement