Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWATX vs RLBAX
FWATX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FWATX vs RLBAX
FWATX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWATX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWATX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FWATX (3.53B). FWATX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FWATX (3.43) vs RLBAX (1.13). FWATX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FWATX (11 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FWATX (1.12). FWATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). FWATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FWATX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX (10.90) and FWATX (10.75) have marching annual gain over last year. FWATX return over 5 years is better than : 31.34 vs. RLBAX (29.34).
| FWATX | RLBAX | FWATX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.32 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.32 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.153 | 9.852 | 62% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 283B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.43 | 1.13 | 304% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.75 | 10.90 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.30 | 40.91 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.34 | 29.34 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.49 | 74.89 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers