Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWATX vs RLBCX
FWATX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FWATX vs RLBCX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income A
Price$14.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.78B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$35.92
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.02B
FWATX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWATX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWATX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 248B vs. FWATX (2.78B). FWATX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FWATX (3.68) vs RLBCX (1.63). FWATX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FWATX (10 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). FWATX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). FWATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). FWATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FWATX (0) vs RLBCX (250). FWATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.01 vs. RLBCX (6.05). FWATX return over 5 years is better than : 53.14 vs. RLBCX (39.81).
| FWATX | RLBCX | FWATX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.89 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.89 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.817 | 5.796 | 66% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.78B | 248B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.68 | 1.63 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | 6.05 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.47 | 30.55 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.14 | 39.81 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement