Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWATX vs RLBCX
FWATX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FWATX vs RLBCX
FWATX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWATX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWATX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FWATX (3.69B). FWATX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FWATX (3.19) vs RLBCX (1.52). FWATX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FWATX (11 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). FWATX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). FWATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBCX (50.00). FWATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FWATX (0) vs RLBCX (250). FWATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.33 vs. RLBCX (16.29). FWATX (34.36) and RLBCX (34.25) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWATX | RLBCX | FWATX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.89 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.89 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.084 | 9.218 | 77% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 1.52 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.33 | 16.29 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.97 | 42.92 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.36 | 34.25 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.82 | 85.64 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement