Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWATX vs RLBEX
FWATX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FWATX vs RLBEX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income A
Price$15.07
Change-$0.06 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.93B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$37.53
Change-$0.14 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
FWATX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWATX vs. RLBEX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWATX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. FWATX (2.93B). FWATX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FWATX (3.18) vs RLBEX (1.79). FWATX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FWATX (10 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). FWATX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). FWATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). FWATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FWATX (0) vs RLBEX (250). FWATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.25 vs. RLBEX (7.68). FWATX return over 5 years is better than : 46.04 vs. RLBEX (36.85).
| FWATX | RLBEX | FWATX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.59 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.59 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.046 | 10.177 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.93B | 255B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 1.79 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.25 | 7.68 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.17 | 36.13 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.04 | 36.85 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.64 | - |