Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWATX vs RLBEX
FWATX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FWATX vs RLBEX
FWATX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWATX vs. RLBEX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWATX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FWATX (3.53B). FWATX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FWATX (3.43) vs RLBEX (1.79). FWATX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FWATX (11 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). FWATX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). FWATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBEX (50.00). FWATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FWATX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.76 vs. FWATX (10.75). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 33.50 vs. FWATX (31.34).
| FWATX | RLBEX | FWATX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.60 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.60 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.153 | 10.378 | 59% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 283B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.43 | 1.79 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.75 | 11.76 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.30 | 44.18 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.34 | 33.50 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.49 | 86.32 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement