Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWATX vs RLBEX
FWATX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FWATX vs RLBEX
FWATX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWATX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWATX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FWATX (3.69B). FWATX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FWATX (3.19) vs RLBEX (1.77). FWATX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FWATX (11 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). FWATX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). FWATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBEX (50.00). FWATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FWATX (0) vs RLBEX (250). FWATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.33 vs. RLBEX (14.85). FWATX (34.36) and RLBEX (34.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWATX | RLBEX | FWATX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.60 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.60 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.084 | 8.255 | 86% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 1.77 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.33 | 14.85 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.97 | 42.82 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.36 | 34.08 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.82 | 90.09 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement