Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWATX vs RLBEX
FWATX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FWATX vs RLBEX
FWATX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWATX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWATX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FWATX (3.56B). FWATX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FWATX (3.44) vs RLBEX (1.77). FWATX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FWATX (11 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). FWATX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). FWATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBEX (50.00). FWATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FWATX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. FWATX (9.72). RLBEX (31.73) and FWATX (30.26) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWATX | RLBEX | FWATX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.60 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.60 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.800 | 7.798 | 49% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.56B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 1.77 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.72 | 10.35 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.64 | 37.72 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.26 | 31.73 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.30 | 82.62 | 131% |