Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWBTX vs RAMHX
FWBTX vs RAMHX Comparison
Open Charts FWBTX vs RAMHX
FWBTX vs RAMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWBTX vs. RAMHX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWBTX is a Hold and RAMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RAMHX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FWBTX (3.53B). FWBTX pays higher dividends than RAMHX: FWBTX (2.68) vs RAMHX (1.39). FWBTX was incepted earlier than RAMHX: FWBTX (11 years) vs RAMHX (12 years). FWBTX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RAMHX (1.04). FWBTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RAMHX (50.00). FWBTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RAMHX: FWBTX (0) vs RAMHX (250). FWBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.54 vs. RAMHX (12.07). FWBTX (31.68) and RAMHX (31.49) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWBTX | RAMHX | FWBTX / RAMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.04 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.04 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.583 | 9.770 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 283B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 1.39 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.54 | 12.07 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.19 | 43.02 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.68 | 31.49 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.78 | 77.38 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement