Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWBTX vs RLBAX
FWBTX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FWBTX vs RLBAX
FWBTX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWBTX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWBTX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FWBTX (3.69B). FWBTX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FWBTX (2.48) vs RLBAX (1.14). FWBTX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FWBTX (11 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). FWBTX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). FWBTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). FWBTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FWBTX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FWBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.48 vs. RLBAX (15.80). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.83 vs. FWBTX (29.35).
| FWBTX | RLBAX | FWBTX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.32 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.32 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.761 | 8.988 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 1.14 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.48 | 15.80 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.79 | 41.07 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.35 | 31.83 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.72 | 80.24 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement