Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWBTX vs RLBAX
FWBTX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FWBTX vs RLBAX
FWBTX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWBTX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWBTX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FWBTX (3.53B). FWBTX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FWBTX (2.68) vs RLBAX (1.13). FWBTX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FWBTX (11 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). FWBTX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). FWBTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). FWBTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FWBTX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FWBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.54 vs. RLBAX (11.72). FWBTX return over 5 years is better than : 31.68 vs. RLBAX (29.85).
| FWBTX | RLBAX | FWBTX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.32 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.32 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.583 | 9.555 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 283B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 1.13 | 237% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.54 | 11.72 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.19 | 41.70 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.68 | 29.85 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.78 | 73.93 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers