Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs GAOFX
FWCBX vs GAOFX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs GAOFX
FWCBX vs GAOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. GAOFX (2.24B). FWCBX pays higher dividends than GAOFX: FWCBX (2.93) vs GAOFX (2.47). FWCBX was incepted earlier than GAOFX: FWCBX (6 years) vs GAOFX (8 years). GAOFX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). GAOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). GAOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCBX: GAOFX (0) vs FWCBX (250). FWCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.11 vs. GAOFX (4.05). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.40 vs. GAOFX (6.45).
| FWCBX | GAOFX | FWCBX / GAOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.90 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.95 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.695 | 6.409 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 2.24B | 5,804% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 2.47 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.11 | 4.05 | 299% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.26 | 33.80 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.40 | 6.45 | 735% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers