Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs GBPIX
FWCBX vs GBPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 116B vs. GBPIX (39.3M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than GBPIX: FWCBX (3.25) vs GBPIX (1.71). FWCBX was incepted earlier than GBPIX: FWCBX (5 years) vs GBPIX (9 years). GBPIX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.32). GBPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 214.00 vs. FWCBX (56.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBPIX: FWCBX (250) vs GBPIX (1000000). FWCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.05 vs. GBPIX (-0.37).
| FWCBX | GBPIX | FWCBX / GBPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.61 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.61 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.226 | 10.442 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116B | 39.3M | 295,165% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 1.71 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.05 | -0.37 | -4,305% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.51 | 27.19 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 29.09 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement