Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs GBPIX
FWCBX vs GBPIX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs GBPIX
FWCBX vs GBPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. GBPIX (42.4M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than GBPIX: FWCBX (2.97) vs GBPIX (1.10). FWCBX was incepted earlier than GBPIX: FWCBX (6 years) vs GBPIX (10 years). GBPIX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). GBPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 233.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBPIX: FWCBX (250) vs GBPIX (1000000). FWCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.22 vs. GBPIX (7.18). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.01 vs. GBPIX (6.31).
| FWCBX | GBPIX | FWCBX / GBPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.61 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.61 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.608 | 10.686 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 42.4M | 301,887% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 1.10 | 270% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.22 | 7.18 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.80 | 23.41 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.01 | 6.31 | 666% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers