Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs HDCVX
FWCBX vs HDCVX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs HDCVX
FWCBX vs HDCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCBX vs. HDCVX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCBX is a Hold and HDCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. HDCVX (364M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than HDCVX: FWCBX (2.91) vs HDCVX (1.21). FWCBX was incepted earlier than HDCVX: FWCBX (6 years) vs HDCVX (14 years). HDCVX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). HDCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDCVX: FWCBX (250) vs HDCVX (2500). HDCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.95 vs. FWCBX (7.04). HDCVX return over 5 years is better than : 58.81 vs. FWCBX (44.25).
| FWCBX | HDCVX | FWCBX / HDCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.84 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.10 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.740 | 17.327 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 364M | 35,989% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 1.21 | 241% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.04 | 14.95 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.35 | 58.01 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.25 | 58.81 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 115.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers