Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs HDRVX
FWCBX vs HDRVX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs HDRVX
FWCBX vs HDRVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCBX vs. HDRVX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCBX is a Hold and HDRVX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. HDRVX (364M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than HDRVX: FWCBX (2.91) vs HDRVX (1.90). FWCBX was incepted earlier than HDRVX: FWCBX (6 years) vs HDRVX (11 years). HDRVX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). HDRVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDRVX: FWCBX (250) vs HDRVX (1000000). HDRVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.61 vs. FWCBX (7.87). HDRVX return over 5 years is better than : 67.21 vs. FWCBX (44.51).
| FWCBX | HDRVX | FWCBX / HDRVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.77 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.99 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.823 | 19.158 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 364M | 35,989% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 1.90 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.87 | 17.61 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.51 | 65.73 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.51 | 67.21 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 138.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement