Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs LGMNX
FWCBX vs LGMNX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs LGMNX
FWCBX vs LGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. LGMNX (2.82B). FWCBX pays higher dividends than LGMNX: FWCBX (3.00) vs LGMNX (1.23). FWCBX was incepted earlier than LGMNX: FWCBX (6 years) vs LGMNX (9 years). LGMNX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). FWCBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. LGMNX (35.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMNX: FWCBX (250) vs LGMNX (1000000). FWCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.71 vs. LGMNX (7.07). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.02 vs. LGMNX (-3.51).
| FWCBX | LGMNX | FWCBX / LGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.83 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.83 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.597 | 6.763 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 2.82B | 4,537% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 1.23 | 244% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.71 | 7.07 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.46 | 22.95 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.02 | -3.51 | -1,224% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QQXT | 99.14 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust NASDAQ-100 ex-Tech Sect ETF | |||
| JEPI | 56.76 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | |||
| QOWZ | 34.44 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco Nasdaq Free CA Flw Achiev ETF | |||
| UUUG | 4.54 | N/A | N/A |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF | |||
| XONE | 49.26 | -0.02 | -0.03% |
| BondBloxx Bloomberg One YrTrgDurUSTrsETF | |||