Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs MSTGX
FWCBX vs MSTGX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs MSTGX
FWCBX vs MSTGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. MSTGX (143M). MSTGX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: MSTGX (4.21) vs FWCBX (2.97). FWCBX was incepted earlier than MSTGX: FWCBX (6 years) vs MSTGX (8 years). MSTGX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). MSTGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). MSTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCBX: MSTGX (0) vs FWCBX (250). MSTGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.61 vs. FWCBX (10.88). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.59 vs. MSTGX (12.39).
| FWCBX | MSTGX | FWCBX / MSTGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.74 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.77 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.608 | 6.561 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 143M | 89,510% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 4.21 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.88 | 11.61 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.83 | 35.20 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.59 | 12.39 | 344% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers