Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs MTISX
FWCBX vs MTISX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs MTISX
FWCBX vs MTISX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. MTISX (1.18B). FWCBX pays higher dividends than MTISX: FWCBX (2.97) vs MTISX (2.16). FWCBX was incepted earlier than MTISX: FWCBX (6 years) vs MTISX (6 years). MTISX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). FWCBX (50.00) and MTISX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MTISX: FWCBX (250) vs MTISX (1000). MTISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.98 vs. FWCBX (12.84). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.29 vs. MTISX (34.35).
| FWCBX | MTISX | FWCBX / MTISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.28 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.28 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.228 | 14.283 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 1.18B | 10,847% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 2.16 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.84 | 24.98 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.11 | 54.61 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.29 | 34.35 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement