Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs MTISX
FWCBX vs MTISX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs MTISX
FWCBX vs MTISX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCBX vs. MTISX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCBX is a Hold and MTISX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. MTISX (1.19B). FWCBX pays higher dividends than MTISX: FWCBX (2.91) vs MTISX (2.25). FWCBX was incepted earlier than MTISX: FWCBX (6 years) vs MTISX (6 years). MTISX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). FWCBX (50.00) and MTISX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MTISX: FWCBX (250) vs MTISX (1000). MTISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.04 vs. FWCBX (11.32). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.17 vs. MTISX (33.65).
| FWCBX | MTISX | FWCBX / MTISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.28 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.28 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.062 | 15.717 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 1.19B | 10,906% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 2.25 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.32 | 21.04 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.36 | 58.07 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.17 | 33.65 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement