Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs MTODX
FWCBX vs MTODX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs MTODX
FWCBX vs MTODX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. MTODX (1.19B). FWCBX pays higher dividends than MTODX: FWCBX (3.00) vs MTODX (2.63). FWCBX was incepted earlier than MTODX: FWCBX (6 years) vs MTODX (8 years). MTODX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). FWCBX (50.00) and MTODX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. MTODX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCBX: MTODX (0) vs FWCBX (250). MTODX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.49 vs. FWCBX (10.50). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.39 vs. MTODX (38.83).
| FWCBX | MTODX | FWCBX / MTODX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.69 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.69 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.834 | 15.000 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 1.19B | 10,765% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 2.63 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.50 | 22.49 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | 59.08 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.39 | 38.83 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers