Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs NRIAX
FWCBX vs NRIAX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs NRIAX
FWCBX vs NRIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 127B vs. NRIAX (1.19B). NRIAX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: NRIAX (5.57) vs FWCBX (2.97). FWCBX was incepted earlier than NRIAX: FWCBX (6 years) vs NRIAX (15 years). NRIAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). NRIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRIAX: FWCBX (250) vs NRIAX (2500). FWCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.43 vs. NRIAX (10.81). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 41.32 vs. NRIAX (22.80).
| FWCBX | NRIAX | FWCBX / NRIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.16 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.17 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.890 | 5.111 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 127B | 1.19B | 10,708% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 5.57 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.43 | 10.81 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.55 | 31.96 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.32 | 22.80 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers