Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs NRIAX
FWCBX vs NRIAX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs NRIAX
FWCBX vs NRIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCBX vs. NRIAX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCBX is a Hold and NRIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. NRIAX (1.19B). NRIAX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: NRIAX (5.60) vs FWCBX (2.91). FWCBX was incepted earlier than NRIAX: FWCBX (6 years) vs NRIAX (15 years). NRIAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). NRIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRIAX: FWCBX (250) vs NRIAX (2500). FWCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.75 vs. NRIAX (4.38). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.08 vs. NRIAX (20.19).
| FWCBX | NRIAX | FWCBX / NRIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.16 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.17 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.364 | 3.275 | 286% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 1.19B | 10,972% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 5.60 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.75 | 4.38 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.28 | 31.25 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.08 | 20.19 | 223% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers