Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs NRICX
FWCBX vs NRICX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs NRICX
FWCBX vs NRICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. NRICX (1.2B). NRICX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: NRICX (4.74) vs FWCBX (2.93). FWCBX was incepted earlier than NRICX: FWCBX (6 years) vs NRICX (15 years). NRICX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). NRICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRICX: FWCBX (250) vs NRICX (2500). FWCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.11 vs. NRICX (7.86). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.40 vs. NRICX (19.09).
| FWCBX | NRICX | FWCBX / NRICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.91 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.92 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.695 | 5.577 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 1.2B | 10,806% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 4.74 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.11 | 7.86 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.26 | 33.91 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.40 | 19.09 | 248% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers