Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs NRICX
FWCBX vs NRICX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs NRICX
FWCBX vs NRICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. NRICX (1.2B). NRICX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: NRICX (4.85) vs FWCBX (2.97). FWCBX was incepted earlier than NRICX: FWCBX (6 years) vs NRICX (15 years). NRICX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). NRICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRICX: FWCBX (250) vs NRICX (2500). FWCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.18 vs. NRICX (10.17). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.08 vs. NRICX (18.69).
| FWCBX | NRICX | FWCBX / NRICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.91 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.92 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.411 | 5.016 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 1.2B | 10,711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 4.85 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.18 | 10.17 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.50 | 31.49 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.08 | 18.69 | 225% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement