Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs NRIFX
FWCBX vs NRIFX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs NRIFX
FWCBX vs NRIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCBX vs. NRIFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCBX is a Hold and NRIFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. NRIFX (1.2B). NRIFX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: NRIFX (5.93) vs FWCBX (2.91). FWCBX was incepted earlier than NRIFX: FWCBX (6 years) vs NRIFX (10 years). NRIFX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). NRIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRIFX: FWCBX (250) vs NRIFX (1000000). FWCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.87 vs. NRIFX (5.59). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.51 vs. NRIFX (23.08).
| FWCBX | NRIFX | FWCBX / NRIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.81 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.82 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.823 | 4.485 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 1.2B | 10,908% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 5.93 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.87 | 5.59 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.51 | 34.08 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.51 | 23.08 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement