Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs PDAIX
FWCBX vs PDAIX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs PDAIX
FWCBX vs PDAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. PDAIX (124M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than PDAIX: FWCBX (2.97) vs PDAIX (1.77). FWCBX was incepted earlier than PDAIX: FWCBX (6 years) vs PDAIX (10 years). PDAIX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). PDAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDAIX: FWCBX (250) vs PDAIX (1000000). PDAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.46 vs. FWCBX (12.80). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.90 vs. PDAIX (11.01).
| FWCBX | PDAIX | FWCBX / PDAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.77 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.25 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.608 | 6.714 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 124M | 103,226% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 1.77 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.80 | 16.46 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.76 | 35.58 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.90 | 11.01 | 390% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement