Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs PDAIX
FWCBX vs PDAIX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs PDAIX
FWCBX vs PDAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. PDAIX (123M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than PDAIX: FWCBX (3.00) vs PDAIX (1.80). FWCBX was incepted earlier than PDAIX: FWCBX (6 years) vs PDAIX (10 years). PDAIX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). PDAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDAIX: FWCBX (250) vs PDAIX (1000000). PDAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.16 vs. FWCBX (10.71). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.02 vs. PDAIX (9.46).
| FWCBX | PDAIX | FWCBX / PDAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.77 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.25 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.597 | 5.855 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 123M | 104,065% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 1.80 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.71 | 13.16 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.46 | 31.22 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.02 | 9.46 | 455% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement