Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs PDRDX
FWCBX vs PDRDX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs PDRDX
FWCBX vs PDRDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. PDRDX (2.6B). PDRDX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: PDRDX (3.77) vs FWCBX (3.00). FWCBX was incepted earlier than PDRDX: FWCBX (6 years) vs PDRDX (16 years). PDRDX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). PDRDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.90 vs. FWCBX (50.00). PDRDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCBX: PDRDX (0) vs FWCBX (250). PDRDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.13 vs. FWCBX (10.71). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.02 vs. PDRDX (22.61).
| FWCBX | PDRDX | FWCBX / PDRDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.87 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.92 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.597 | 10.893 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 2.6B | 4,927% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 3.77 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.71 | 18.13 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.46 | 32.38 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.02 | 22.61 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.28 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement