Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs PDRDX
FWCBX vs PDRDX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs PDRDX
FWCBX vs PDRDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCBX vs. PDRDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCBX is a Hold and PDRDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. PDRDX (2.65B). PDRDX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: PDRDX (3.60) vs FWCBX (2.91). FWCBX was incepted earlier than PDRDX: FWCBX (6 years) vs PDRDX (17 years). PDRDX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). PDRDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.90 vs. FWCBX (50.00). PDRDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCBX: PDRDX (0) vs FWCBX (250). PDRDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.56 vs. FWCBX (7.87). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.51 vs. PDRDX (25.58).
| FWCBX | PDRDX | FWCBX / PDRDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.87 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.92 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.823 | 14.768 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 2.65B | 4,949% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 3.60 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.87 | 18.56 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.51 | 40.29 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.51 | 25.58 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers