Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs QGBLX
FWCBX vs QGBLX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs QGBLX
FWCBX vs QGBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. QGBLX (7.75M). QGBLX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: QGBLX (7.82) vs FWCBX (2.97). FWCBX was incepted earlier than QGBLX: FWCBX (6 years) vs QGBLX (3 years). QGBLX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). QGBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 982.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QGBLX: FWCBX (250) vs QGBLX (10000). FWCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.18 vs. QGBLX (-14.43).
| FWCBX | QGBLX | FWCBX / QGBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.69 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.69 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.411 | 3.158 | 235% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 7.75M | 1,650,761% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 7.82 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.18 | -14.43 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.50 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.08 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement