Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs RAPCX
FWCBX vs RAPCX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs RAPCX
FWCBX vs RAPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. RAPCX (1.91B). RAPCX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: RAPCX (4.95) vs FWCBX (3.00). FWCBX was incepted earlier than RAPCX: FWCBX (6 years) vs RAPCX (14 years). RAPCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). RAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). RAPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCBX: RAPCX (0) vs FWCBX (250). RAPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.15 vs. FWCBX (10.71). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.02 vs. RAPCX (36.70).
| FWCBX | RAPCX | FWCBX / RAPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.81 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.91 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.597 | 10.739 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 1.91B | 6,716% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 4.95 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.71 | 18.15 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.46 | 35.65 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.02 | 36.70 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NBIZ | 9.92 | 0.73 | +7.94% |
| Tradr 2X Short Nbis Daily ETF | |||
| EQRR | 80.77 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | |||
| CPSU | 27.68 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June | |||
| WTMF | 40.89 | -0.16 | -0.39% |
| WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy ETF | |||
| IHE | 99.99 | -0.52 | -0.52% |
| iShares US Pharmaceuticals ETF | |||