Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs RAZAX
FWCBX vs RAZAX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs RAZAX
FWCBX vs RAZAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. RAZAX (605M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than RAZAX: FWCBX (2.97) vs RAZAX (2.29). FWCBX was incepted earlier than RAZAX: FWCBX (6 years) vs RAZAX (9 years). RAZAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). RAZAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). RAZAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCBX: RAZAX (0) vs FWCBX (250). RAZAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.35 vs. FWCBX (12.18). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.08 vs. RAZAX (24.71).
| FWCBX | RAZAX | FWCBX / RAZAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.15 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.33 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.411 | 7.492 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 605M | 21,157% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 2.29 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.18 | 16.35 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.50 | 43.70 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.08 | 24.71 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement