Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs RAZAX
FWCBX vs RAZAX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs RAZAX
FWCBX vs RAZAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCBX vs. RAZAX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCBX is a Hold and RAZAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. RAZAX (604M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than RAZAX: FWCBX (2.91) vs RAZAX (2.33). FWCBX was incepted earlier than RAZAX: FWCBX (6 years) vs RAZAX (9 years). RAZAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). RAZAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). RAZAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCBX: RAZAX (0) vs FWCBX (250). RAZAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. FWCBX (11.52). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.00 vs. RAZAX (24.32).
| FWCBX | RAZAX | FWCBX / RAZAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.15 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.33 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.930 | 8.295 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 604M | 21,523% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 2.33 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.52 | 12.28 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.08 | 42.82 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.00 | 24.32 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement