Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs RAZCX
FWCBX vs RAZCX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs RAZCX
FWCBX vs RAZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. RAZCX (610M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than RAZCX: FWCBX (2.93) vs RAZCX (1.73). FWCBX was incepted earlier than RAZCX: FWCBX (6 years) vs RAZCX (9 years). RAZCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). RAZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). RAZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCBX: RAZCX (0) vs FWCBX (250). RAZCX (12.58) and FWCBX (12.11) have marching annual gain over last year. FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.40 vs. RAZCX (23.46).
| FWCBX | RAZCX | FWCBX / RAZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.90 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.08 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.695 | 8.577 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 610M | 21,311% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 1.73 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.11 | 12.58 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.26 | 43.35 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.40 | 23.46 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers