Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs RAZCX
FWCBX vs RAZCX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs RAZCX
FWCBX vs RAZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCBX vs. RAZCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCBX is a Hold and RAZCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. RAZCX (599M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than RAZCX: FWCBX (2.91) vs RAZCX (1.70). FWCBX was incepted earlier than RAZCX: FWCBX (6 years) vs RAZCX (9 years). RAZCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). RAZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). RAZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCBX: RAZCX (0) vs FWCBX (250). RAZCX (7.98) and FWCBX (7.87) have marching annual gain over last year. FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.51 vs. RAZCX (20.91).
| FWCBX | RAZCX | FWCBX / RAZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.90 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.08 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.823 | 7.009 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 599M | 21,870% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 1.70 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.87 | 7.98 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.51 | 39.78 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.51 | 20.91 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement