Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs RAZCX
FWCBX vs RAZCX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs RAZCX
FWCBX vs RAZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. RAZCX (606M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than RAZCX: FWCBX (3.00) vs RAZCX (1.71). FWCBX was incepted earlier than RAZCX: FWCBX (6 years) vs RAZCX (9 years). RAZCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). RAZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). RAZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCBX: RAZCX (0) vs FWCBX (250). RAZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. FWCBX (10.71). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.02 vs. RAZCX (20.01).
| FWCBX | RAZCX | FWCBX / RAZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.90 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.08 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.597 | 6.594 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 606M | 21,122% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 1.71 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.71 | 12.22 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.46 | 36.06 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.02 | 20.01 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement