Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs RIRGX
FWCBX vs RIRGX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs RIRGX
FWCBX vs RIRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX (128B) and RIRGX (128B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RIRGX (3.04) and FWCBX (3.00) have matching dividends . FWCBX was incepted earlier than RIRGX: FWCBX (6 years) vs RIRGX (17 years). FWCBX (0.31) is less costly to investors than RIRGX (0.26). FWCBX (50.00) and RIRGX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. FWCBX (250) and RIRGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RIRGX (10.91) and FWCBX (10.86) have marching annual gain over last year. FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.33 vs. RIRGX (39.77).
| FWCBX | RIRGX | FWCBX / RIRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.26 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.26 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.782 | 8.798 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 128B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 3.04 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.86 | 10.91 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.70 | 43.93 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.33 | 39.77 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement