Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs RMGYX
FWCBX vs RMGYX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs RMGYX
FWCBX vs RMGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. RMGYX (605M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than RMGYX: FWCBX (2.97) vs RMGYX (2.66). FWCBX was incepted earlier than RMGYX: FWCBX (6 years) vs RMGYX (9 years). RMGYX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). RMGYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMGYX: FWCBX (250) vs RMGYX (10000000). RMGYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.92 vs. FWCBX (12.18). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.08 vs. RMGYX (27.17).
| FWCBX | RMGYX | FWCBX / RMGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.70 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.88 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.411 | 7.815 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 605M | 21,157% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 2.66 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.18 | 16.92 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.50 | 45.75 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.08 | 27.17 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement