Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs SLFYX
FWCBX vs SLFYX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs SLFYX
FWCBX vs SLFYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. SLFYX (518M). SLFYX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: SLFYX (4.58) vs FWCBX (3.00). FWCBX was incepted earlier than SLFYX: FWCBX (6 years) vs SLFYX (12 years). SLFYX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). FWCBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. SLFYX (44.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLFYX: FWCBX (250) vs SLFYX (100000). FWCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.07 vs. SLFYX (9.40). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.37 vs. SLFYX (30.82).
| FWCBX | SLFYX | FWCBX / SLFYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.79 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.04 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.769 | 5.942 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 518M | 24,710% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 4.58 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.07 | 9.40 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.04 | 22.83 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.37 | 30.82 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers