Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs SLFYX
FWCBX vs SLFYX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs SLFYX
FWCBX vs SLFYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. SLFYX (530M). SLFYX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: SLFYX (4.49) vs FWCBX (2.97). FWCBX was incepted earlier than SLFYX: FWCBX (6 years) vs SLFYX (11 years). SLFYX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). FWCBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. SLFYX (44.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLFYX: FWCBX (250) vs SLFYX (100000). SLFYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. FWCBX (10.56). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.40 vs. SLFYX (33.01).
| FWCBX | SLFYX | FWCBX / SLFYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.79 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.04 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.846 | 7.712 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 530M | 24,151% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 4.49 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.56 | 12.06 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.28 | 24.39 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.40 | 33.01 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement