Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs TRXAX
FWCBX vs TRXAX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs TRXAX
FWCBX vs TRXAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 127B vs. TRXAX (14.9M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than TRXAX: FWCBX (2.97) vs TRXAX (2.20). FWCBX was incepted earlier than TRXAX: FWCBX (6 years) vs TRXAX (15 years). TRXAX (2.48) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). TRXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRXAX: FWCBX (250) vs TRXAX (2500). TRXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.91 vs. FWCBX (12.88). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 41.26 vs. TRXAX (18.34).
| FWCBX | TRXAX | FWCBX / TRXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.23 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.48 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.274 | 5.932 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 127B | 14.9M | 852,349% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 2.20 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.88 | 13.91 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.73 | 29.44 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.26 | 18.34 | 225% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers