Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs TRXAX
FWCBX vs TRXAX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs TRXAX
FWCBX vs TRXAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCBX vs. TRXAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCBX is a Hold and TRXAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. TRXAX (14.7M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than TRXAX: FWCBX (2.91) vs TRXAX (2.11). FWCBX was incepted earlier than TRXAX: FWCBX (6 years) vs TRXAX (15 years). TRXAX (2.48) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). TRXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRXAX: FWCBX (250) vs TRXAX (2500). TRXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.83 vs. FWCBX (7.87). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.51 vs. TRXAX (21.49).
| FWCBX | TRXAX | FWCBX / TRXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.23 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.48 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.823 | 6.660 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 14.7M | 891,156% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 2.11 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.87 | 9.83 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.51 | 27.61 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.51 | 21.49 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement