Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs TRXCX
FWCBX vs TRXCX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs TRXCX
FWCBX vs TRXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. TRXCX (14.9M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than TRXCX: FWCBX (2.93) vs TRXCX (1.48). FWCBX was incepted earlier than TRXCX: FWCBX (6 years) vs TRXCX (15 years). TRXCX (3.23) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). TRXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRXCX: FWCBX (250) vs TRXCX (2500). FWCBX (12.11) and TRXCX (11.97) have marching annual gain over last year. FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.40 vs. TRXCX (18.07).
| FWCBX | TRXCX | FWCBX / TRXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.98 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 3.23 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.695 | 7.556 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 14.9M | 872,483% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 1.48 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.11 | 11.97 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.26 | 27.35 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.40 | 18.07 | 262% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers