Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs TRXCX
FWCBX vs TRXCX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs TRXCX
FWCBX vs TRXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. TRXCX (14.8M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than TRXCX: FWCBX (2.97) vs TRXCX (1.57). FWCBX was incepted earlier than TRXCX: FWCBX (6 years) vs TRXCX (15 years). TRXCX (3.23) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). TRXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRXCX: FWCBX (250) vs TRXCX (2500). TRXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.31 vs. FWCBX (12.18). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.08 vs. TRXCX (16.39).
| FWCBX | TRXCX | FWCBX / TRXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.98 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 3.23 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.411 | 5.960 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 14.8M | 864,865% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 1.57 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.18 | 13.31 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.50 | 26.25 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.08 | 16.39 | 257% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement