Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs TRXIX
FWCBX vs TRXIX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs TRXIX
FWCBX vs TRXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. TRXIX (14.6M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than TRXIX: FWCBX (2.93) vs TRXIX (2.39). FWCBX was incepted earlier than TRXIX: FWCBX (6 years) vs TRXIX (12 years). TRXIX (2.23) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). TRXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRXIX: FWCBX (250) vs TRXIX (2500). FWCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.53 vs. TRXIX (12.50). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 46.27 vs. TRXIX (21.60).
| FWCBX | TRXIX | FWCBX / TRXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.98 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.23 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.614 | 5.990 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 14.6M | 876,712% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 2.39 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.53 | 12.50 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.54 | 26.94 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.27 | 21.60 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers