Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs TRXIX
FWCBX vs TRXIX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs TRXIX
FWCBX vs TRXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCBX vs. TRXIX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCBX is a Hold and TRXIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. TRXIX (14.7M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than TRXIX: FWCBX (2.91) vs TRXIX (2.35). FWCBX was incepted earlier than TRXIX: FWCBX (6 years) vs TRXIX (12 years). TRXIX (2.23) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). TRXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRXIX: FWCBX (250) vs TRXIX (2500). TRXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.09 vs. FWCBX (7.87). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.51 vs. TRXIX (23.09).
| FWCBX | TRXIX | FWCBX / TRXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.98 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.23 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.823 | 6.783 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 14.7M | 891,156% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 2.35 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.87 | 10.09 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.51 | 28.55 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.51 | 23.09 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers