Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs TRXIX
FWCBX vs TRXIX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs TRXIX
FWCBX vs TRXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. TRXIX (14.8M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than TRXIX: FWCBX (2.97) vs TRXIX (2.43). FWCBX was incepted earlier than TRXIX: FWCBX (6 years) vs TRXIX (12 years). TRXIX (2.23) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). TRXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRXIX: FWCBX (250) vs TRXIX (2500). TRXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. FWCBX (12.53). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.91 vs. TRXIX (23.35).
| FWCBX | TRXIX | FWCBX / TRXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.98 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.23 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.543 | 6.461 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 14.8M | 864,865% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 2.43 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | 14.21 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.17 | 19.83 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.91 | 23.35 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement