Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs TRXIX
FWCBX vs TRXIX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs TRXIX
FWCBX vs TRXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. TRXIX (14.8M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than TRXIX: FWCBX (3.00) vs TRXIX (2.37). FWCBX was incepted earlier than TRXIX: FWCBX (6 years) vs TRXIX (12 years). TRXIX (2.23) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). TRXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRXIX: FWCBX (250) vs TRXIX (2500). TRXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.39 vs. FWCBX (10.50). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.39 vs. TRXIX (21.87).
| FWCBX | TRXIX | FWCBX / TRXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.98 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.23 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.834 | 6.228 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 14.8M | 864,865% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 2.37 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.50 | 12.39 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | 29.22 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.39 | 21.87 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers