Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs TZINX
FWCBX vs TZINX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs TZINX
FWCBX vs TZINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. TZINX (346M). TZINX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: TZINX (5.53) vs FWCBX (2.93). FWCBX was incepted earlier than TZINX: FWCBX (6 years) vs TZINX (21 years). TZINX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). TZINX (50.24) and FWCBX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TZINX: FWCBX (250) vs TZINX (100000). TZINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.41 vs. FWCBX (12.11). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.40 vs. TZINX (43.75).
| FWCBX | TZINX | FWCBX / TZINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.96 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.01 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.695 | 16.623 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 346M | 37,572% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 5.53 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.11 | 26.41 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.26 | 62.84 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.40 | 43.75 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement