Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs VGWIX
FWCBX vs VGWIX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs VGWIX
FWCBX vs VGWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCBX vs. VGWIX commentary
Aug 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCBX is a Hold and VGWIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. VGWIX (769M). VGWIX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: VGWIX (3.81) vs FWCBX (2.93). FWCBX was incepted earlier than VGWIX: FWCBX (6 years) vs VGWIX (9 years). VGWIX (0.43) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). VGWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than VGWIX: FWCBX (250) vs VGWIX (3000). FWCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. VGWIX (9.62). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 46.23 vs. VGWIX (20.37).
| FWCBX | VGWIX | FWCBX / VGWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.43 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.43 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.959 | 6.186 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 3000 | 8% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 769M | 16,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 3.81 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.06 | 9.62 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.12 | 30.68 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.23 | 20.37 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers