Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs WABIX
FWCBX vs WABIX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs WABIX
FWCBX vs WABIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCBX vs. WABIX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCBX is a Hold and WABIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. WABIX (428M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than WABIX: FWCBX (2.91) vs WABIX (2.05). FWCBX was incepted earlier than WABIX: FWCBX (6 years) vs WABIX (14 years). WABIX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). FWCBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WABIX (38.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WABIX: FWCBX (250) vs WABIX (1000000). WABIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.65 vs. FWCBX (7.98). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.54 vs. WABIX (39.72).
| FWCBX | WABIX | FWCBX / WABIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.79 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.84 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.337 | 13.122 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 428M | 30,607% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 2.05 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.98 | 17.65 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.73 | 37.62 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.54 | 39.72 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers