Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs WMMRX
FWCBX vs WMMRX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs WMMRX
FWCBX vs WMMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCBX vs. WMMRX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCBX is a Hold and WMMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. WMMRX (472M). WMMRX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: WMMRX (5.95) vs FWCBX (2.91). FWCBX was incepted earlier than WMMRX: FWCBX (6 years) vs WMMRX (21 years). WMMRX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). FWCBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WMMRX (7.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMRX: FWCBX (250) vs WMMRX (1000). WMMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.77 vs. FWCBX (7.98). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.54 vs. WMMRX (32.46).
| FWCBX | WMMRX | FWCBX / WMMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.99 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.35 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.337 | 17.073 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 25 | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 472M | 27,754% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 5.95 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.98 | 20.77 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.73 | 42.92 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.54 | 32.46 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers