Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs WMRIX
FWCBX vs WMRIX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs WMRIX
FWCBX vs WMRIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCBX vs. WMRIX commentary
Sep 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCBX is a Hold and WMRIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. WMRIX (471M). WMRIX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: WMRIX (5.99) vs FWCBX (2.91). FWCBX was incepted earlier than WMRIX: FWCBX (6 years) vs WMRIX (23 years). WMRIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). FWCBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WMRIX (7.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMRIX: FWCBX (250) vs WMRIX (100000). WMRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.05 vs. FWCBX (11.52). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.00 vs. WMRIX (34.17).
| FWCBX | WMRIX | FWCBX / WMRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.75 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.87 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.930 | 18.879 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 471M | 27,601% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 5.99 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.52 | 23.05 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.08 | 42.70 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.00 | 34.17 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.28 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement