Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs WMRIX
FWCBX vs WMRIX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs WMRIX
FWCBX vs WMRIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. WMRIX (460M). WMRIX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: WMRIX (6.12) vs FWCBX (2.93). FWCBX was incepted earlier than WMRIX: FWCBX (6 years) vs WMRIX (23 years). WMRIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). FWCBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WMRIX (7.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMRIX: FWCBX (250) vs WMRIX (100000). WMRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.35 vs. FWCBX (13.29). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 46.98 vs. WMRIX (33.82).
| FWCBX | WMRIX | FWCBX / WMRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.75 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.87 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.814 | 16.458 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 460M | 27,826% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 6.12 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.29 | 23.35 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.88 | 39.79 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.98 | 33.82 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement